smufl-discuss

This forum is an archive for the mailing list smufl-discuss@lists.steinberg.net (more options) Messages posted here will be sent to this mailing list.
Discussion of the Standard Music Font Layout (SMuFL)
12345 ... 25
Topics (844)
Replies Last Post Views
[smufl-discuss] Inconsistent left/right naming for triangle noteheads by L Peter Deutsch
0
by L Peter Deutsch
[smufl-discuss] Re: some missing notehead symbols by L Peter Deutsch
0
by L Peter Deutsch
[smufl-discuss] Re: some missing notehead symbols by dspreadbury
0
by dspreadbury
[smufl-discuss] Re: Begin/end pedal marks by dspreadbury
0
by dspreadbury
[smufl-discuss] some missing notehead symbols by L Peter Deutsch
0
by L Peter Deutsch
[smufl-discuss] Begin/end pedal marks by L Peter Deutsch
0
by L Peter Deutsch
[smufl-discuss] Re: SMuFL development moves to the new W3C Music Notation Community Group by Glenn Linderman
0
by Glenn Linderman
[smufl-discuss] Re: SMuFL development moves to the new W3C Music Notation Community Group by Glenn Linderman
0
by Glenn Linderman
[smufl-discuss] Re: SMuFL development moves to the new W3C Music Notation Community Group by dspreadbury
0
by dspreadbury
[smufl-discuss] Re: SMuFL development moves to the new W3C Music Notation Community Group by dspreadbury
1
by tisimst
[smufl-discuss] SMuFL development moves to the new W3C Music Notation Community Group by dspreadbury
1
by tisimst
[smufl-discuss] Re: SMuFL development moves to the new W3C Music Notation Community Group by Stephen Begley
0
by Stephen Begley
[smufl-discuss] Re: New glyph proposal: Gothic g clef by dspreadbury
0
by dspreadbury
[smufl-discuss] Unintended postings by Knut Nergaard
0
by Knut Nergaard
[smufl-discuss] Re: SMuFL Metadata generation by Knut Nergaard
0
by Knut Nergaard
[smufl-discuss] Re: Is SMuFL's "cClefCombining" LilyPond's varC clef? by Knut Nergaard
0
by Knut Nergaard
[smufl-discuss] Re: New glyph proposal: Gothic g clef by Grzegorz Rolek
0
by Grzegorz Rolek
New glyph proposal: Gothic g clef by SirPL
0
by SirPL
[smufl-discuss] Re: Tuplets in SMuFL Text by Knut Nergaard
0
by Knut Nergaard
[smufl-discuss] Re: Tuplets in SMuFL Text by dspreadbury
0
by dspreadbury
[smufl-discuss] Re: Tuplets in SMuFL Text by Knut Nergaard
0
by Knut Nergaard
[smufl-discuss] Re: Tuplets in SMuFL Text by dspreadbury
0
by dspreadbury
[smufl-discuss] Re: Tuplets in SMuFL Text by Knut Nergaard
0
by Knut Nergaard
[smufl-discuss] Re: Tuplets in SMuFL Text by Mark Johnson
0
by Mark Johnson
[smufl-discuss] Re: Tuplets in SMuFL Text by Knut Nergaard
0
by Knut Nergaard
[smufl-discuss] Tuplets in SMuFL Text by Knut Nergaard
0
by Knut Nergaard
[smufl-discuss] Re: Proposal to move development of SMuFL to the W3C by Adrian Holovaty
0
by Adrian Holovaty
[smufl-discuss] Proposal to move development of SMuFL to the W3C by dspreadbury
0
by dspreadbury
[smufl-discuss] Re: Is SMuFL's "cClefCombining" LilyPond's varC clef? by uliska
0
by uliska
[smufl-discuss] Re: Is SMuFL's "cClefCombining" LilyPond's varC clef? by Knut Nergaard
0
by Knut Nergaard
[smufl-discuss] Re: Is SMuFL's "cClefCombining" LilyPond's varC clef? by dspreadbury
0
by dspreadbury
[smufl-discuss] Re: Is SMuFL's "cClefCombining" LilyPond's varC clef? by uliska
0
by uliska
[smufl-discuss] Re: Is SMuFL's "cClefCombining" LilyPond's varC clef? by Knut Nergaard
0
by Knut Nergaard
[smufl-discuss] Re: Is SMuFL's "cClefCombining" LilyPond's varC clef? by uliska
0
by uliska
[smufl-discuss] Re: Is SMuFL's "cClefCombining" LilyPond's varC clef? by uliska
0
by uliska
12345 ... 25